This week’s column title first headlined Sunday’s edition of the San Francisco Call—back on May 7, 1899. That 19th century investigative hit piece featured three unflattering John Clawson illustrations portraying “Mammy Pleasant” as a bonneted evil-eyed crone. The story gobbled up the entire front page of that day’s paper. Its “Angel or Arch Fiend” dualism embodies endless confusion and contradictory assertions surrounding the life of this incredible woman —confusion and contradictions lingering on to this very day.

The “Mammy” tag, clearly meant to be a slam, fits neatly within a cluster of Black stereotypes. While Pleasant’s tall, thin frame, her finely honed features and regal bearing contrast sharply with the rotund happy-to-be-a-slave mammy of plantation lore, the name itself intentionally places her status akin to a Samba, Uncle Tom, Step and Fetchit, or to a licentious Jezebel. The mythology of these “halcyon days” of slavery is what Eric Lott calls “the dialectic flickering of racial insult and racial envy.”

Mary Ellen “Mammy” Pleasant’s legacy is an enigma rolled up inside layers of legend, gossip, greed, fantasy, racism and conjecture. She’s been called “San Francisco’s Powerful And Sinister Ruler” or “The Black City Hall”, as well as a “one woman social agency” and “the Mother of Civil Rights in California.” That covers one heck of a lot of reputational territory.

Some claim that Mary Ellen Pleasant was a mixed blood Voodoo Queen who aimed “the black arts” against her enemies, that she sold babies, murdered as many as 49 people, ran brothels, committed fraud, spied through walls on victims she would later blackmail, and that she held unholy powers over a vast network of underlings and protégés. One rival charged that after Pleasant murdered her husband she “had put her fingers in the hole in the top of his head and pulled out the protruding brains.”

Others tout Mary Ellen Pleasant’s work as a philanthropist, her wide array of long time devoted friends, both black and white, her financial wizardry – and her undying devotion to women’s and civil rights, and, before that – her commitment to the abolition of slavery. In fact, Mary Ellen Pleasant’s Napa gravestone reads—SHE WAS A FRIEND OF JOHN BROWN.

Indeed, when Brown was captured following his ill-fated attack on Harper’s Ferry he carried with him a promissory note signed MEP. Had not the authorities misread the M for a W Mary Ellen Pleasant would undoubtedly have had her neck stretched next to John Brown’s.

Everything about Pleasant’s formative years is subject to debate. She was born a slave in Virginia, or Georgia, or perhaps it was Louisiana. She claims to have been born free in Philadelphia on August 19, 1814. Others say she was born in 1817, give or take a year—or two. She was convent educated, or else was entirely self-taught. Her mother may have been a West Indies Voodoo Queen, or not. Her father was a wealthy white slave owner. Then again, perhaps he was a slave. Nobody knows for sure.

What we do know is that sometime between 1848 and 1852 Mary Ellen Pleasant arrived in San Francisco. She may have been accompanied by her second husband, a former slave named James Pleasant, or Pleasants, or perhaps it was Pleasance. Whatever his surname it’s clear that the shrewd, focused and ambitious Mary Ellen was a power unto herself.

James, who died in 1877, seems hardly to have factored into Mary Ellen’s life. His one notable contribution was in the co-creation of Mary Ellen’s one and only child, Elizabeth, whom she called Lizzy. However, Mary Ellen gave their daughter her first husband’s family name—Smith. It was only fair, since James Henry Smith had left seed money to Mary Ellen upon his death, some years before. Mary Ellen built her financial empire with the help of these funds.

Once in San Francisco, Pleasant set about purchasing boardinghouses, real estate, laundries, restaurants and stock shares in mines, railroads and other business ventures. This was no small accomplishment in an era of near unfettered legal bias against both racial minorities and women. Money from these investments built her 30-room mansion dubbed “the House of Mystery”, atop Cathedral Hill in San Francisco.

In her later years Pleasant purchased a large tract of land set against the Mayacamas Mountains. She named it Beltane, either after Thomas Bell, or, as some critics claim, in honor of the ancient pagan celebration of the same name. Beltane lies outside Glen Ellen, in the heart of the Sonoma Valley. The stately New Orleans-style Victorian house she built there (now a B&B) is set amidst an immense flowering garden and hundreds of shady oaks. One fanciful claim is that Pleasant cast Voodoo spells from a cave somewhere on the property.

But with all her accrued wealth, Mary Ellen Pleasant seems always to have performed, or dressed as if she performed, domestic labor. It’s said that she would ride to the markets in her own custom built carriage, accompanied by a driver and a footman, each garbed in impeccable livery. Though always attired in a servant’s black dress and large white apron, she “walked like a duchess.”

Sometime in the mid 1860s Mary Ellen Pleasant hooked up with a stockbroker named Thomas Bell. The “canny Scot” was money savvy, but lacked imagination. Pleasant took him under her wing. Together they created one of the largest financial partnerships in that era of San Francisco. Pleasant and Bell may (or may not) have been lovers.

It’s said that Mary Ellen arranged Thomas’s marriage to the future Teresa Bell, having first instructed Teresa in the “genteel arts” necessary to flourish in elite society. Others say Thomas Bell discovered the beautiful Teresa on a visit to a house of ill repute. No matter which story is true it seems the marriage provided adequate cover from charges of miscegenation, which might otherwise have been leveled at the cohabitation of the white Thomas Bell with the octoroon (or perhaps quadroon) “Mammy” Pleasant.

What’s undeniably true is that Mary Ellen Pleasant was actively involved in the Underground Railroad, and that she placed former slaves and geographically displaced freemen as domestics in many of San Francisco’s “better” households. She also clearly advocated for and personally rescued unprotected and often attractive young white women, who Mary Ellen then trained to become the wives and mistresses of wealthy men in The City.

These actions led to many of the questionable charges against her, since persons beholden to Pleasant for their livelihoods provided her eyes and ears within San Francisco’s most prominent households.

Mary Ellen was well into her 80’s when her finances began to unravel. She’d both overextended her business dealings, and had incurred the wrath of her former protege, Teresa Bell. Mary Ellen had exposed Teresa’s young lover to embezzlement charges, landing him a stint in San Quentin. As payback, the mentally unhinged Tereasa became Pleasants most rapacious foe. She set to pummeling Pleasant’s good name even long after sending Mary Ellen to her grave. Because of the sensitive nature of Thomas Bell’s and Mary Ellen Pleasant’s financial partnership Teresa managed to gain control of their mutual resources following Thomas’ death. Mary Ellen Pleasant was ultimately stripped of her wealth and forced into bankruptcy.

Pleasant’s diaries were stolen and lost to posterity, while many of Teresa’s hallucinatory rants made their way into newsprint following Pleasant’s death. Consequently, Teresa Bell’s accounts fundamentally shifted the Mary Ellen Pleasant mythos into the realm of evil phantasma. Fortunately, contemporary scholars have begun setting Mary Ellen Pleasant’s record as straight as a story with such twists, squiggles and gaping holes can be set. As confusing and contradictory as her life story may be, Mary Ellen Pleasant optimistically forecast her own legacy when she wrote:

“… You can’t explain away the truth.”



3 Responses to ““Mammy Pleasant: Angel or Arch Fiend in the House of Mystery””  

  1. A well thought-out summary of the captivating and confusing life of Mary Ellen Pleasant.

    I am currently creating a theatrical “Haunted Séance” celebrating the Bell’s “House of Mystery” and the Mary Ellen “Mammy” Pleasant saga.

    The séance will be available for private events and eventually have a permanent location within San Francisco in 2008.

    The “Spirits” of Mary, Teresa, and Thomas Bell will all have ample opportunity to comment on their history and attempt to set the records straight.

    If you’re interested in learning more about San Francisco’s Haunted Séance, hosted by The Baron Saturn, you may visit our site at: http://www.HauntedSeance.com thanks for your article!

    The Baron Saturn
    (Walt Anthony, Spellbinder Entertainment)

  2. What a fascinating story! I was only introduced to this tale yesterday when a customer came into my Antique & Curiosity Shop in Placerville, CA and told me he owns a highly carved antique bedroom set that once belonged to Mammy Pleasant. He has built a shrine to her in one room of his house with this set. He knew I was interested in all to do with the occult, mysteries, seances, ghosts and the sort….my shop reflects that with the presence of vintage tarot cards, crystal balls, gypsy collectibles and other haunting old Victorian decor – http://www.gothicroseantiques.com Stop by on your way to Tahoe…
    Great article!

    Crystal
    Purveyor of Fine Macabre Goods
    Gothic Rose Antiques & Curiosities

  3. 3 Roux

    I stumbled across this while doing research on Mary Ellen Pleasant and the “House of Mystery” for a paranormal investigative team. I wanted to comment and thank you for noting that she indeed was slandered there at the end of her long life and to commend you for assisting in setting her record straight.
    Fabulous article indeed !


Leave a Reply